On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 10:51 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 14:22 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > > The outcome of this evaluation process is that we are recommending > > that GNOME sets up its own GitLab instance, as a replacement for > > Bugzilla and cgit. > > I 100% support this move. There are inevitably going to be some pain > points, but the end result will be worth it. > > That said, here's a potential pain point: in Bugzilla, you can have > different components auto-assign to different accounts, and we made > these @gnome.bugs fake accounts for teams. The docs team uses this to > make it easy to follow docs bugs across products. I don't think > GitLab > has any sense of components, preferring the more casual labels for > categorization.
Another potential pain point: in Bugzilla, one can move bugs between products. This happen when the bug has been reported to the wrong product, or when triaging the bugs the developers know the bug is somewhere else in the stack. Gitlab does not allow moving bugs between products. It is expected to be in 8.6 [1], but that is not for sure. [1] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3024 -- Germán Poo-Caamaño http://calcifer.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
