On 13 February 2018 at 11:17, Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 09:33 +0000, Philip Withnall wrote: >> porting the build systems of those modules to Meson is another >> legitimate way to port away from gnome-common. It would be the better >> choice in the long run for modules we are going to be maintaining for >> a while. > > Hi, > I do not want to steal the thread, but when talking about ports to > Meson, would it make sense to finally fix the infrastructure to work > with other than automake files too [1]? It's when generating the > content for developer.|help.gnome.org. Considering that plenty of > projects already use Meson, either exclusively or as an alternative for > autotools scripts, then it would be a good idea, from my point of view. > I'd help myself there, but I do no speak pythonish. I guess someone > with the knowledge would have that fixed relatively quickly.
Work is in progress to let maintainers upload tarballs with the generate API reference for developer.gnome.org; I assume help.gnome.org would follow the same pattern — but of course we only have one Frederic, so help is indeed welcome. Ciao, Emmanuele. -- https://www.bassi.io [@] ebassi [@gmail.com] _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
