On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 09:03 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > If you think the D-Bus service version bump was unnecessary, then I > will revert it. I only thought that it was cleaner, because the C API > function will not fail due to missing D-Bus interface method (to be > honest, I do not know what the GDBusProxy will do when the running > interface doesn't contain all the methods it expects to have).
Hm, isn't this what we have introspection for? I don't *assert* that it was unnecessary... but I kind of *hope* it was unnecessary, and if it really was necessary then I'd hope someone is fixing things so that in future it *wouldn't* be necessary. :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
