On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:26 AM Debarshi Ray <rishi...@lostca.se> wrote: > You already attempted to slander me once before in this thread: > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-January/msg00027.html > > It's been one week since I produced evidence against that: > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-January/msg00035.html > > You had enough time to clarify your original statement or recant it. I > no longer consider anything you say to be in good faith.
This feels like an awfully aggressive way of asking for a reply in a heated thread that's already getting close to 100 emails. I don't know if replying will help but since you seem to want a reply so badly and because I do want to keep acting in good faith and not have our relationship damaged over this, here's a reply. > Select a recipe > -> Buy ingredients > -> View shopping list > -> Share > -> Add service > -> Todoist Your test case was so minimal that I didn't understand that's what it was. Let me give a few more words. Step 0 is to build GOA with --disable-todoist (if like me you're still using the stable version of GOA). Then log out and log back in to make sure that you're using the correct GOA service. The final step where you click the word Todoist opens gnome-control-center to the Online Accounts page which does not have a Todoist provider since we removed it in Step 0. I did the test case a month and a half ago and drafted an email to you to let you know about the 2 things I saw as mistakes in your commit message but I decided it was too much like nitpicking for me to send that email then. Maybe it would have been better if I had sent it then. > https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-todo/3.91/ Wait, GNOME To Do has one experimental release targeting GTK4 using the same version number scheme as GTK4 and that's enough for you to say that they are not following GNOME's Release Schedule? I think it's reasonable to interpret the release number as a mistake (although a fairly easy one to make given how GTK and GNOME release schedules have been aligned fairly closely since 2011 and that the developer wasn't around for GTK2). That version obviously isn't intended for distros to ship and I think it's a reasonable way to identify releases in an experimental series so that they don't conflict with new major releases in the ordinary stable track. If you object to the version number used, I encourage you to talk to the developer politely about it. I don't see a need to recant anything in my short original email. I'm sorry that you feel so attacked in this thread and I apologize if my replies or lack of replying feels like I'm trying to hurt you more. That is not my intent at all. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list