On 31/05/2020 18.46, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:35 am, Michael Catanzaro > <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: >> Still failing, now on a different runner: >> >> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/jobs/744761 >> >> Can you please try triggering a new CI run to make sure it actually >> passes...? > > I just triggered seven pipelines and five of them failed: > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/jbrummer/epiphany/-/jobs/744763 > https://gitlab.gnome.org/jbrummer/epiphany/-/jobs/744768 > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/jobs/743538 > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/jobs/744761 > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/jobs/744762 > > >
And another 7 worked just fine, so I don't think your claim I haven't checked is fair at all. Previously uploaded cache was still being used. Jobs reliably pass now, or fail for reasons unrelated to infrastructure. I have the impression that CI changes made by infrastructure team are whims rather than requests made by other developers we try to implement while dealing with multiple moving parts we haven't developed ourselves. I assure you we also wish to spend our time otherwise but it is what it is. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
