Can Roy be more specific about what the Desktop has done to not fulfill ARTICLE VIII.
The statement: Failure to follow that process is grounds for dissolution of the community and reorganization of its work in a form that will obey the rules by which we agreed to form this organization. None of the projects governed by the Desktop Community have demonstrated any sense of awareness of these rules, and Project Indiana has deliberately ignored them on several occasions. is rather to vague. Furthermore, this also the first time that as a desktop community member that I have heard about this. I am sure there are many people like me who are in the same boat, shocking and wondering why we are the one who are being singled out. -Ghee Stefan Teleman wrote: > On Thursday 01 November 2007 21:25, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > >> I hereby appeal to the OGB to dissolve the Desktop Community >> and call for proposals for its work to be reorganized into >> communities that actually intend to work on OpenSolaris projects >> in accordance with the OpenSolaris Constitution. >> > > -1. > > And you may consider this negative vote as the official position of > the KDE e.V. as well. > > Reply-To: set to teleman at kde.org > > Stefan Teleman > >
