>>>>> "Shawn" == Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> writes:
Shawn> 2) Not every technical decision is going to require a vote and Shawn> thus those that are primarily interested only in the technical Shawn> aspects would be best suited with a contributor grant. I'm not sure I understand you. The people you want as core contributors are those you trust to make decisions for the group. Those decisions can be technical or non-technical. So, I agree that people who only want to produce code, but who don't want to take on the responsibilities of technical leadership, should be contributors, not core contributors. But if someone is interested in (only) technical leadership, they should be eligible for core contributorship. That person just needs to understand that it's important to vote on other issues (a "0" vote--abstention--is always an option). mike
