I have seen several Self Review cases filed for this type of thing. I
sent one to a sponsor earlier today to move the rest of Foomatic,
GhostScript, HPIJS, and Gimpprint out of /usr/sfw. If you are upgrading
as well, you would need to at least FastTrack it. If someone thinks
that it needs more scrutiny, I'm sure that they will speak up.
-Norm
John Fischer wrote:
> Dermot,
>
> If an ARC case is needed then it would probably be a fast track
> and automatically approved. The fast track would simply be a
> record of what took place and give advanced notice to anyone
> within Sun or the community that depends upon it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> Dermot McCluskey wrote:
>
>> When bison was moved from /usr/sfw, liby, which is part of bison but
>> delivered in
>> SUNWgccruntime, was not moved with it. I'd now like to correct this, but am
>> wondering if this
>> simple move requires an ARC case?
>>
>> The files to be moved are:
>> /usr/sfw/lib/liby.so.1 -> /usr/gnu/lib/liby.so.1
>> /usr/sfw/lib/amd64/liby.so.1 -> /usr/gnu/lib/amd64/liby.so.1
>> /usr/sfw/lib/sparcv9/liby.so.1 -> /usr/gnu/lib/sparcv9/liby.so.1
>>
>> Compatibility links will be maintained in /usr/sfw/lib (plus the usual links
>> without the .1 suffix).
>> These files were not mentioned in the original ARC case.
>>
>> - Dermot
>>
>>
>> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> desktop-discuss mailing list
>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
