Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Bob Palowoda wrote: > >>> Artem: >>> >>> Just because two users have complained doesn't >>> necessarily mean that >>> this will be a high call generator. >>> >> Actually my original question was related to the document >> GPL-LGPLArchRules.html. >> Is it a proprietary document? >> > > Yes, the current form is unfortunately labeled Sun Confidential. > It's also currently wrong about several things, due to changes > since it was written in 2001 (such as Solaris being open sourced), > which is one of the reasons a new set of rules is being drafted - > hopefully those will be publically publishable. > > If solaris is GPLed, there is no problem to integrate libcdio back.
when GPLV3 will be ready?
