* Laszlo (Laca) Peter <laca at Sun.COM> [2007-03-15 10:47]: > On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 10:36 -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > * Laszlo (Laca) Peter <laca at sun.com> [2007-03-15 10:19]: > > > On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 09:55 -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote: > > > > I compiled it all w/ gcc; it works. Getting tools like this > > > > into customers' hands has got to be higher on our priority list > > > > than tilting at the one true compiler windmill. > > > > > > Sure thing. The problem is with the ABI differences between > > > g++-compiled and Sun Studio-compiled c++ libs. One possibility > > > is shipping 2 variants (/usr/lib/g++/libgtkmm-2.4.so?). > > > > Do we know how many other GNOME apps/components might use gtkmm? > > http://www.gtkmm.org/extra.shtml
Thanks. The reason I ask was to see if we could completely bury them inside an Inkscape directory, but it appears not. One non-insane possibility is that (unlike licensing), we could handle the name conflict between two distinct ABI compiled libraries using /usr/gnu/lib for the alternate C++ ABI. - Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems stephen.hahn at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
