-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [lsb-discuss] DAM-4 summary points
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:43:25 -0700
From: John Cherry <[email protected]>
To: Desktop_architects at lists.linux-foundation.org
CC: lsb-discuss at lists.freestandards.org

DAM-4 Summary Points
--------------------

- The Desktop architects meeting yielded a new set of priorities
   for the community.  The priorities continue to evolve and shift.
   The new priorities set by the Desktop Architects for and with
   the community are as follows:

                 Multimedia
                 Packaging
                 Developer Tools
                 Power Management
                 World Typography
                 Printing

- The gstreamer and helix communities agreed to engage in the
    analysis of their respective multimedia frameworks to advance
    the development of Linux sound solutions.  Linux distribution
    representatives agreed to evaluate the low level audio interfaces
    and to recommend standard audio and multimedia stack
    implementations.  OSS announced that they have moved their code
    into the open source, providing more options in the audio stack.

   Breakout notes:
http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Dam-4_breakout_multimedia

- The LF DAM-4 packaging workgroup included representatives from
   the distributions, ISVs, enterprise I/T, individual users and
   open source software application owners/maintainers.   The
   discussion started to identify the viewpoints of the stakeholders
   and what is required to improve Linux application packaging for
   all communities.  Particular focus on the user experience, how to
   manage trusted repositories, package standardization, integration
   and testing.   The communities will continue to refine these
   packaging requirements on the LSB packaging mailing list.

   Breakout notes:
http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Dam-4_breakout_packaging

- D-BUS was actively discussed by the desktop architects. The meeting
   included representatives from both the KDE and GNOME communities
   who agreed to issue the following joint statement on D-BUS "Both
   KDE and GNOME committed to D-BUS at DAM-4, and to a common set of
   interfaces for desktop services."

- The desktop architects agreed to extend standard internationalized
   text layouts mechanisms and font management.  Adopt HarfBuzz as an
   open standard to compliment FreeType and Font Config. (HarfBuzz is
   an OpenType Layout engine.)

- The discussion on developer tools surfaced Eclipse as an IDE
   solution for the gaps found in other existing developer tools now
   widely used by the community, like gdb.

- Recent improvements in power management have shown up to 20% better
   power utilization in typical Linux desktops and laptops.  Developers
   continue to use power monitoring tools to evaluate power usage and
   to develop multiple-state power decisions.  Good, auto-magic power
   management should be pushed into the kernel and into the driver
   level when possible, but power policy can be managed in user space.
   The general power management case is pretty well covered.  However,
   more device/peripheral support is needed to take advantage of low
   power modes beyond just the power modes of the processor.  Power
   management developers are meeting next week (June 25-26) in Ottawa
   to continue vital power management discussions.


https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-May/012759.html

- The printing team discussion : Distro independent printer driver
   DDK (driver development kit) The DDK will allow printer
   manufacturers to target multiple Linux distributions with their
   drivers, reducing the time and expense it takes for them to support
   Linux.  Linux users no longer need to worry about compatibility
   between their printer and distribution.

- A record number of desktop architects from the Linux distributions,
   hardware and software vendors that support Linux, and open desktop
   organizations attended and participated in the Desktop Architects
   Meeting, a regular meeting of the open desktop architects.

It was great to see many of you at the Google facility in Mountain View.
It was difficult to catch all the topics, so please add your summaries
on this mailing lists.  I'll continue to add presentations to the DAM-4
site as they come in (there were a couple of late-breaking
presentations).

http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/DAM-4_Presentations

Power management discussion will continue next week at OLS.  I believe
the sessions on June 25-26 will be led by Len Brown.

https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-May/012759.html

Relating to world typography, Ed Trager is hosting a text layout summit
at aKademy in a couple of weeks as well.

http://akademy2007.kde.org/codingmarathon/textlayoutsummit.php

Thanks again to the Linux Foundation Desktop Linux workgroup for
sponsoring and coordinating DAM-4.  It was a good time for collaboration
for meeting the architects and developers in the desktop community.  I
notice many other collaboration meetings outside of the planned
breakouts.  When the right people get together, good things just happen.
There were some hacking sessions in mobile space and some genuine
interest from the kernel developers in desktop activities, including
power management.  Thanks to the LSB developers that joined our sessions
and participated in the breakouts.

Perhaps the most interesting points relating to the acceleration of the
use of Linux came from our mobile Linux representatives.  David "Lefty"
Schlesinger gave a talk on the top issues facing the deployment of Linux
on mobile devices.  He basically stated that there were no roadblocks!
Just watch the deployment of handheld mobile devices running Linux this
year.  The forecast for the next few years is great.  While things like
power management could always be better, there are no real showstoppers
for mobile deployments.

Cheers,
John



_______________________________________________
lsb-discuss mailing list
lsb-discuss at lists.freestandards.org
http://lists.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss

Reply via email to