Possibly a nice solution but it appears to rely on automake 1.11, our current CBE only contains 1.10.... although I would prefer this method instead of shave especially as it can be implemented in the configure.in/ac files to maintain backward compatibility with older versions of automake and not break our builds
The Shave M4 macro's also appear to require a specific version of libtool, haven't quite worked out which version yet. Matt Ghee Teo wrote: > Some of the new modules may be affected by this, currently at least > gnome-panel 2.26.2 > Matt, you patch may be fixed by this suggested fix here :) > > -Ghee > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Nicer compilation output with shave or automake1.11 > From: > Javi <javierjc1982 at gmail.com> > Date: > Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:01:31 +0200 > To: > desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list at gnome.org> > > To: > desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list at gnome.org> > > Return-path: > <desktop-devel-list-bounces at gnome.org> > Received: > from fe-emea-10.sun.com ([unknown] [192.18.6.120]) by > emea3-mail1.uk.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 > 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTP id > <0KKO00IMBW7VUF90 at emea3-mail1.uk.sun.com> for > gheet at emea3-mail1.UK.Sun.COM; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:02:19 +0100 (BST) > Received: > from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun > Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id > <0KKO00C00W4VZQ00 at fe-emea-10.sun.com> for gheet at emea3-mail1.UK.Sun.COM > (ORCPT ghee.teo at sun.com); Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:02:19 +0100 (BST) > Received: > from phys-emea3-2.uk.sun.com ([unknown] [192.18.6.7]) by > fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit > (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTP id <0KKO00A94W7Q6H20 at fe-emea-10.sun.com> > for gheet at emea3-mail1.UK.Sun.COM (ORCPT ghee.teo at sun.com); Thu, 04 Jun > 2009 02:02:14 +0100 (BST) > Received: > from dm-ireland-01.uk.sun.com ([unknown] [129.156.101.187]) by > emea3-mail1.uk.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 > 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTP id > <0KKO00ILJW7QUF90 at emea3-mail1.uk.sun.com> for > gheet at emea3-mail1.UK.Sun.COM (ORCPT ghee.teo at sun.com); Thu, 04 Jun 2009 > 02:02:14 +0100 (BST) > Received: > from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM > [129.158.71.19]) by dm-ireland-01.uk.sun.com > (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n5412DgD023737 for > <ghee.teo at ireland.sun.com>; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:02:14 +0100 (BST) > Received: > from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM > [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com > (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n5411pTf027099 for > <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:ghee.teo at sun.com>; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:02:12 > +0800 (SGT) > Received: > from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by > nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 > (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KKO00A1VW7N0A00 at nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for > ghee.teo at sun.com (ORCPT ghee.teo at sun.com); Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:02:11 > -0700 (PDT) > Received: > from sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.24]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com > (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with > ESMTP id <0KKO008CXW7N2630 at nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for > ghee.teo at sun.com (ORCPT ghee.teo at sun.com); Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:02:11 > -0700 (PDT) > Received: > from relay15i.sun.com (ip125.net129179-4.block1.us.syntegra.com > [129.179.4.125]) by sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP > id n540ndUY007220 for <ghee.teo at sun.com>; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:02:10 > +0000 (GMT) > Received: > from mmp11es.mmp.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.208.11] [160.41.208.11]) by > relay15i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-4156033 for ghee.teo at sun.com; Thu, > 04 Jun 2009 01:02:04 +0000 (Z) > Received: > from relay13i.sun.com (relay13i.sun.com [129.179.4.123]) by > mmp11es.mmp.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-62981313 for > ghee.teo at sun.com; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:02:00 +0000 (Z) > Received: > from menubar.gnome.org ([209.132.176.177] [209.132.176.177]) by > relay1i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-2747413 for ghee.teo at sun.com; Thu, > 04 Jun 2009 01:02:00 +0000 (Z) > Received: > from menubar.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by > menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3954D7501B6; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 > 01:02:00 +0000 (GMT) > Received: > from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org > (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6EB750122 for <desktop-devel-list at gnome.org>; > Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:01:53 +0000 (GMT) > Received: > from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org > [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y7hXxDVZWr+6 for > <desktop-devel-list at gnome.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:01:44 +0000 (GMT) > Received: > from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com > [209.85.220.226]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id > B635F7500EC for <desktop-devel-list at gnome.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 > 01:01:35 +0000 (GMT) > Received: > by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so358320fxm.15 for > <desktop-devel-list at gnome.org>; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:01:33 -0700 (PDT) > Received: > by 10.223.113.200 with SMTP id b8mr905961faq.84.1244077291276; Wed, 03 > Jun 2009 18:01:31 -0700 (PDT) > DKIM-Signature: > v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; > h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject > :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; > bh=1ScxYNl8Xgk/y+WG3ymgyD92yyKNZkEK/K7fpwoyFHs=; > b=CQf5I/cORjAAwATL4o8YUjzT4ar37R2XNUsJIKVofHla+8Y3haGavAsEy7cQnQqOYY > YtpZV7HwAFUN6NfHF/hiG1QZJ11f33/F6gfaHw/7Tr4R6P02IJsfRidRIWGVPrag2QmS > GjF1ZuF0SzjuKbwOI2u+9NyfT9KOLbRkrQTKc= > DomainKey-Signature: > a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; > h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type > :content-transfer-encoding; > b=ctrwHz23+oqXTK0M1uDxhnm64bXm7zWtTjeK8/6+FALK8oV8QMmofSYWu5NGt+imKx > CCfN7Rvg5pOuWQeItBq/UHqdhpx/e15bgM4dl1s400dzWTdhE96yFqKtS4fk6/ISpHHF > LWBPcuJvAKeNSaE0Giqu/vuwkgd0hJgknFc90= > Sender: > desktop-devel-list-bounces at gnome.org > Errors-to: > desktop-devel-list-bounces at gnome.org > Message-ID: > <ba00a630906031801i78a54783yb6cd1126c38f43e7 at mail.gmail.com> > MIME-Version: > 1.0 > Content-type: > text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-transfer-encoding: > BASE64 > Precedence: > list > X-BeenThere: > desktop-devel-list at gnome.org > Delivered-to: > desktop-devel-list at gnome.org > X-PMX-Version: > 5.4.1.325704 > X-Brightmail-Tracker: > AAAAAA== > X-Original-To: > desktop-devel-list at gnome.org > X-Virus-Scanned: > by amavisd-new at gnome.org > X-Spam-Flag: > NO > X-Spam-Score: > -2.599 > X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: > Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (up: 7760 hrs), (distance 14, link: > ethernet/modem), [209.85.220.226] > X-Antispam: > No, score=1.5/5.0, scanned in 2.010sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by > smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ > X-Mailman-Version: > 2.1.10 > List-Post: > <mailto:desktop-devel-list at gnome.org> > List-Subscribe: > <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list>, > <mailto:desktop-devel-list-request at gnome.org?subject=subscribe> > List-Unsubscribe: > <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/options/desktop-devel-list>, > <mailto:desktop-devel-list-request at gnome.org?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Archive: > <http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list> > List-Help: > <mailto:desktop-devel-list-request at gnome.org?subject=help> > List-Id: > GNOME Desktop Development List <desktop-devel-list.gnome.org> > Original-recipient: > rfc822;ghee.teo at sun.com > X-Spam-Status: > No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] > > > Hello all, > > This is my first post to the list, so hello everyone! > > There is a GnomeGoal [1] to turn the usual messy output of autotools > into a pretty Kbuild-like one using shave [2]. > As pointed in bug #580062 [3] , automake1.11 has a feature that do the > same as shave do. Is only necessary to add one line in your > configure.ac > See the GnomeGoal page for more details. > > So I propose to use automake instead shave for this goal, but it'd be > great hear your opinion. > Also, if this list is not the correct place to do this, please tell me. > > Best regards > > [1] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/NicerBuilds > [2] http://git.lespiau.name/cgit/shave/tree/README > [3] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580062 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-discuss mailing list > desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
