Darren Kenny wrote: > As I understand it, this is only replacing the "manager" interface > (gnome-keyring-manager) - not the infrastructure (libgnomekeyring, et al) - so > the main configuration should remain the same. > Yes. And Seahorse implements all the functionality of gnome-keyring and won't change the configuration. > I don't think anyone has looked at building Seahorse on Solaris yet, so I > think > the decision w.r.t Solaris would have to be held off until this is done. > I built it on Solaris successfully after making some patches. I also wrote the spec files and committed them into SFE repository. Please enjoy it.
Thanks, Jerry > Darren. > > Mike Kupfer wrote: > >>>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Cameron <Brian.Cameron at sun.com> writes: >>>>>>> >> Brian> I'd guess this means we don't need to worry about gnome-keyring >> Brian> and gnome-keyring-manager anymore. Darren Kenny is the owner of >> Brian> gnome-keyring.spec. Any thoughts? >> >> What's the upgrade/migration path for users? Ideally, Seahorse uses the >> same files as gnome-keyring, so users won't have to do anything. But I >> don't know much about either package... >> >> mike >> _______________________________________________ >> desktop-discuss mailing list >> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org >> > _______________________________________________ > desktop-discuss mailing list > desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org >
