Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>> and if in
>> doubt, the effects of using the autotools-based build system are
>> assumed to be desirable.
>
> No, I don't agree with that. Autotools have some very undesirable
> effects. And SFW cannot avoid them either. Otherwise samba would
> not have been broken by updating gnutls (can't find the bugid).
Well...
that bugid is:
6435463 snv_41 with new libgnutls breaks samba
but it's not 'configure' that automatically found libgnutls, samba's
Makefile.sfw adds it explicitly before running configure with:
"LIBS=-lrt -lgnutls -lsocket -lnsl -lldap"
I removed it and it built fine (though I have no idea if it works)
so I don't know why it was added, and I don't see any reason why in any
of the bugs listed in the delta (but perhaps I missed it):
6332751 Samba is not compiled with LDAP support and lacks the 'net' command.
6174211 Samba 3.x package should be compiled with ldap support:
--with-ldapsam config opti
on
6362017 RPC error when login in to Samba 3.0.11 PDC using 64-bit windows
clients (Xp or Wi
n2003)
6344828 Solaris 10 Samba causes windows explorer into a "Not Responding"
state
Mike
