Bob Doolittle wrote:
> Calum Benson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 22:38 -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>
>>  
>>>>>> The relevant GNOME bug is
>>>>>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31316 and while it's 
>>>>>> claimed
>>>>>> to work, it doesn't for me. Looking at the vte source
>>>>>> http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/vte/trunk/src/vte.c?revision=1910&view=markup
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there's a variable meta_sends_escape which is set by default, but it
>>>>>> doesn't seem to be working.
>>>>>>           
>>>>> Heh.  Yeah, well it doesn't work for me the way they describe 
>>>>> it.            
>>>> Do you want to follow it up, or is Alt working enough for you?
>>>>       
>>> I'm not sure how to follow up.  Every time I've asked about this in 
>>> the past, I've been promptly ignored.  I don't know who I need to 
>>> thwack to understand this complaint.
>>>     
>> Well, it wouldn't hurt to add a comment to the bug report in response to
>> the last one ("is there still a problem here?")... that's where it's
>> going to get the most visibility with the GNOME folks.  (Or perhaps Bob
>> could do that, as he's already contributed to the comment thread.)
>>   
>
> I don't use this feature so I'm afraid I'm not
> really the right person to comment.  I don't like
> leading Esc chars.  I prefer the Meta parity bit
> (which works fine with my favorite shell - zsh),
> and that's what my ancient comment was requesting.
> But my suggestion was rejected because it won't
> work with multibyte character input (which xterm
> never handled it seems).  So I'm sticking to xterm
> for this and other reasons (mostly related to
> configurability of double- and triple- click
> selections as well as performance on Sun Ray).

Hmm... mystery solved.  I had swapped my keys in a .xmodmap a while 
back, to deal with a kvm switch that was weirdly swapping modifiers, and 
when I removed the kvm switch, it caused problems.

Xterm at least works for me.  And, now, so does gnome-terminal.  So I'm 
happy.  Never mind....

    -- Garrett
>
> -Bob
>


Reply via email to