OK.  Sounds good.  As soon as the interface-table.txt is updated than you
have my +1.

Thanks,

John

On 05/ 6/10 07:49 PM, Jedy Wang wrote:
On 05/ 7/10 03:25 AM, Brian Cameron wrote:

cc:ing gnome-...@sun.com

You don't really explain how you plan to fix this problem. Could you please provide more information about the specific changes you are
making?

Can you work with the gnome-arc team to update the interface-table.txt file so that it shows any interface changes that you plan to make to
fix this problem?

I will move it back to /usr/lib/evolution/%version.
Regards,

Jedy

Once the interface-table.txt file is updated in the arc-documents SVN
repository, I will update it in the ARC case directory, and then we
should be able to get John to provide a +1 and close this case as
approved.

Note that we can get the ARC approval before the actual fix is
implemented and integrated into spec-files.  We just cannot integrate
into Nevada until we make the change so that what we integrate conforms
to what was agreed in the ARC review.  So, the interface-table.txt file
can be updated quickly to get the process moving.

Brian


On 05/ 6/10 01:34 AM, Jedy Wang wrote:
On 05/ 6/10 02:31 AM, John Fischer wrote:
Brian,

nit - modulediffs.txt lists old SVr4 packages, it should probably use
IPS to
be consistent. No need to update the materials just for future cases.

Is evolution-alarm-notify meant to be executed by a user?

/usr/bin/evolution-alarm-notify

I just got the reply from the community. There is no specific reason to
move evolution-alarm-notify to /usr/bin. I will make a patch to fix this
problem.

Regards,

Jedy




_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to