Launchpad has imported 10 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40719.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-09-08T15:30:52+00:00 madbiologist wrote: Created attachment 50979 Output of PDF fonts Originally reported by Raivo Lill at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/838856 "I expected to see document but only see in header company name and in document lines." I can reproduce this on Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" beta 1. Packages: evince 3.1.2-0ubuntu4 libpoppler13 0.16.7-2ubuntu2 libcairo2 1.10.2-6ubuntu3 Running Evince from the command prompt produces the following error sequence (I have <snipped> some of it out so it is not so long): Error: Unknown font tag 'F1' Error (11028): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F1' Error (11041): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F1' Error (11070): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F2' Error (11097): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F2' Error (11117): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F2' Error (11147): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F2' <snip> Error: Unknown font tag 'F1' Error (12582): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F3' Error (12607): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F3' Error (12616): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F1' Error (12722): No font in show <snip> Error: Unknown font tag 'F1' Error (13971): No font in show Error: Unknown font tag 'F1' Error (14028): No font in show Error: Bad descendant font in Type 0 font Error: Bad descendant font in Type 0 font Error: Bad descendant font in Type 0 font This is repeated 2 or 3 times. Attempting to run pdffonts and redirect the output to a file just results in a file with only the headings (attached) and produces 3 errors in the terminal: Error: Bad descendant font in Type 0 font Error: Bad descendant font in Type 0 font Error: Bad descendant font in Type 0 font Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-09-08T15:33:10+00:00 madbiologist wrote: Created attachment 50980 the problem document Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-26T12:00:25+00:00 thomasfr wrote: Created attachment 60610 Reconstruct xref table if xref needed but missing The PDF is defect: It's xref table does only contain entries for obj's 1 to 11 (without any reference to another xref table), but it contains 23 objects and all of them are needed. The patch now tries to reconstruct the xref table also in such a case, how obviously also done by acrobat. But You should file a bug to the PDF creator (OJAMM?, I never heard about it) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-26T12:19:23+00:00 thomasfr wrote: Created attachment 60611 PDF repaired with pdfseparate For Your convenience, here the PDF repaired by pdfseparate (after applying the patch) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-26T18:40:06+00:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote: This patch produces a change in http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tests/Ghent_V3.0/072_OutputIntent_ISOCoated2-v1_x3.pdf I wouldn't say it's a regression because Adobe Reader does not render any of the X we render, but the change seems strange to me. Thomas do you think i should worry about this? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-26T19:52:46+00:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Created attachment 60630 The patch also makes this file fail to pen Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-26T19:53:15+00:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote: And with fail to pen i mean fail to open, i.e. after using the patch suggested by thomas i can't open it anymore. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-27T08:15:34+00:00 thomasfr wrote: Created attachment 60651 Reconstruct xref table if xref needed but missing Sorry, I was a little bit too quick and dirty, and not cowardly enough: I missed a condition with splitted xref tables and run too early in trying to reconstruct a (valid) xref table. This new patch should solve that, but I don't want to waste Your time: I plan to regtest the min linewidth this weekend, so if You haven't spare time to look into it, I'll give an additional comment if this patch is save after regtesting it by my own. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-27T08:19:10+00:00 thomasfr wrote: Comment on attachment 60610 Reconstruct xref table if xref needed but missing Sorry, forget to mark the former patch as obsolete and don't know how to do that without uploading a new attachement :-( Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-28T10:44:36+00:00 thomasfr wrote: Comment on attachment 60651 Reconstruct xref table if xref needed but missing I regtested now this patch (of comment 7), I found no regressions. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/comments/18 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838856 Title: cannot show pdf file from one sender but WIN Acrobat reader can show. Status in Poppler: Confirmed Status in “poppler” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: evince %U Description: Ubuntu 11.04 Release: 11.04 Paigaldatud: 2.32.0-0ubuntu12.3 Kandidaat: 2.32.0-0ubuntu12.3 Versioonitabel: *** 2.32.0-0ubuntu12.3 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.32.0-0ubuntu12.2 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 Packages 2.32.0-0ubuntu12 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages I expected to see document but only see in heater company name and in document lines ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: evince 2.32.0-0ubuntu12.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.49-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Sep 1 17:14:31 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evince InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcCmdline_: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-11-generic root=UUID=41c17016-d3f9-4ebc-beee-81e34c8e0d84 ro vga=769 quiet splash vt.handoff=7 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=et_EE:en LANG=et_EE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature_: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.49-generic 2.6.38.8 SourcePackage: evince UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-18 (105 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/838856/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
