Launchpad has imported 16 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32781.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-02T17:00:21+00:00 Mcpierce wrote:

In an outline, wherever the sequence "III" appears as part of the
numbering itself, the text of the outline is indented a number of
spaces.

For example, where "III" or "VIII" or "XIII" appear, the text is
indented the same number of spaces.

If, however, the outline is changed to not use "III" then the indenting
goes away.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-04T10:08:47+00:00 Yfjiang wrote:

(In reply to comment #0)
> In an outline, wherever the sequence "III" appears as part of the numbering
> itself, the text of the outline is indented a number of spaces.
> 
> For example, where "III" or "VIII" or "XIII" appear, the text is indented the
> same number of spaces.
> 
> If, however, the outline is changed to not use "III" then the indenting goes
> away.

Hello Darryl, I didn't really see the problem from my understanding
(tried Tools->Outline Numbering and Paragraph numbering).

Would you help attach a sample document? More descriptive step by step
reproducing instruction would also be welcome. In addition, it is also
nice to have a screen snapshot of the problem. Thank you!

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-04T10:51:38+00:00 Mcpierce wrote:

The attachment named "With.odt" shows the error, an With.png is a
screenshot of it. The outline scheme selected is I.A.i.a).

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-04T10:52:06+00:00 Mcpierce wrote:

Created attachment 41611
Document showing the error.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-04T10:52:29+00:00 Mcpierce wrote:

Created attachment 41612
Screenshot of document with error.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-04T10:53:05+00:00 Mcpierce wrote:

Created attachment 41613
Same document with outline changed; error goes away.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-04T10:53:24+00:00 Mcpierce wrote:

Created attachment 41614
Screenshot of document without error.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/6

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-05T03:09:43+00:00 Yfjiang wrote:

Created attachment 41658
comprehensive bullets

Thanks Daryl for the samples.

Confirmed reproducible on 3.3 rc2.

Meanwhile it is a more general problem of number/alphabetic bullet items
drawing and happens not only in roman numbers. I attached a
comprehensive bullets document (comprehensive-bullet.odt) revealing more
problems in the relevant area.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-01-05T03:10:24+00:00 Yfjiang wrote:

For Cedric's review.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/8

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-02-15T13:23:33+00:00 Cedric-bosdonnat-ooo wrote:

The bigger spaces in With.odt and comprehensive-bullets.odt are due to a
too small indent after the numbering.

If the whole numbering text (with prefix and suffix included) is larger
than the tabstop defined for the numbering level, then the tab uses the
next tabstop of the paragraph. This problem would be fixed by changing
the default tabstop to something that fits your use.

Closing as not a bug

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/9

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-02-25T11:17:41+00:00 Cedric-bosdonnat-ooo wrote:

*** Bug 34698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/10

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-02-27T23:00:23+00:00 Walter Lapchynski wrote:

(In reply to comment #9)
> If the whole numbering text (with prefix and suffix included) is larger than
> the tabstop defined for the numbering level, then the tab uses the next 
> tabstop
> of the paragraph. This problem would be fixed by changing the default tabstop
> to something that fits your use.

It seems that what you were saying was to increase the value of the
default tabstop. Changing anything there just made things worse. So I
tried the opposite direction. I set the default tabstop to the smallest
amount I could get it to take-- 0.20"-- and it still did not correct the
problem for the third item of the first level (III.). It did help some
other levels, but that one could not be fixed.

Furthermore, I cannot entirely understand the logic of having the
outline defined by, or influenced by, the default tabstop. It seems
intuitive to me that one would modify tab settings within Bullets and
Numbering and would expect this to override the default tabstop.

That being said, even if it's not a bug, I don't think it makes much
sense, and I would request a change from this behavior.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/11

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-02-28T08:55:50+00:00 Cedric-bosdonnat-ooo wrote:

Created attachment 43915
Screenshot showing the value to change

This may even be an interesting easy hack.

The default numbering are provided by this code:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/libs-gui/i18npool/source/defaultnumberingprovider/defaultnumberingprovider.cxx

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/12

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-02-28T08:56:32+00:00 Cedric-bosdonnat-ooo wrote:

Returning to the pool as it's an easy hack

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/13

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-02T17:18:40+00:00 andreschnabel wrote:

did some research, outline definitions are in
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/i18npool/source/localedata/data/

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/23

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-05-18T16:31:02+00:00 Reisi007 wrote:

Deleted "Easyhack" from summary.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-
libreoffice/+bug/789919/comments/24

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789919

Title:
  [Upstream] Extra space in some roman numerals points in outline mode

Status in LibreOffice Productivity Suite:
  Confirmed
Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: libreoffice

  1) lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 11.04
  Release:      11.04

  2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
  libreoffice-writer:
    Installed: 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu1
    Candidate: 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu1
    Version table:
   *** 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu1 0
          500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386 
Packages
          100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
       1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
          500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 
Packages
       1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
          500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

  3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

  cd ~/Desktop && wget -c
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/789919/+attachment/2147378/+files/Error%20Example.odt
  -O info.odt && lowriter info.odt

  is the third roman numeral in the list does not have a long space
  between it and the first character.

  4) What happens instead is it does.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
  Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
  Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sun May 29 19:12:33 2011
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 
(20101007)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US:en
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: libreoffice
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-23 (6 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/789919/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to