So if I understood correctly Qt is only using the dlopen approach to overcome restrictions to crypto exports but not (L)GPL incompatibilities, like stated here: http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/ssl.html
Getting back to our point I'll need the definitive opinion from Poppler maintainers on using dlopen'ed openssl or replacing it with NSS. Both options are extra work but I'm willing to do the extra mile to get this accepted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures Status in Poppler: Confirmed Status in “poppler” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Binary package hint: evince This is a feature request to verify digital signatures. I'm receiving more and more digitally signed PDF's and evince already acknowledges them with: Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by <signer> Date: <time stamp> Reason: <reason> Location: <location> but it would be great if Evince would be integrated into the distro's ca-certificate infrastructure to verify these signatures. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
