Which is why I stepped down to the ATI/AMD 12.4 driver which had previously 
worked is that I don't really have the time to play "throw  darts on the wall" 
with  drivers at the moment to see which works. If 12.10 doesn't work because 
of something lame like a drive, it's off the menu regardless of how polished it 
may be. 
12.04 (sort of ) works OOTB, but the 'updated' driver set on 12.04 does not. 
OOTB, 12.10 is a complete fail for me.

While I do appreciate Ubuntu (and other 'nix variants are not Windows) I am 
pretty sure a motherboard from 2011 should work with a modern 'nix distro.
My laptop based on 4 year old  hardware  happily runs Sabayon (Linux kernel 
3.5)  or the latest Gnome Ubuntu.  They are very different machines. One fails 
completely, the other works like a charm post upgrade. 

A user, irrespective of  technically ability, should be able to expect
their operating system to continue to work after an upgrade. The upgrade
should  give a serious hardware check before doing anything that may
hamper that user's chances of being able to do anything post upgrade.

It has it's own issues but Sabayon is far better in this respect because rather 
than dumbing down the updates/upgrades, there is a box which basically says "if 
you do X, Y may happen.  Z may be an option and here is more information". This 
is  where Rigo (Sabayon's  GUI software installer)  totally flattens Ubuntu's 
both the Software Centre & Update Manager. But that is just my opinion. I may 
not be able to use it, at least I know I am unable to do so. So time is not 
wasted against dumbed down upgrading which just breaks things.
 
Finally, To see if this was avoidable or if the video card was compatible  I 
looked up the Certs page to see what alternative pieces of hardware might be an 
option. Ubuntu's hardware cert pages which used to be great, seems to be dumbed 
down and listed   for down to brands.  If you're lucky, the pointless Community 
hardware search which might give you a irrelevant bit of user info. 

Oh well, I'm pretty sure this will be written off as a dupe or NOF or
something along those lines..

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025488

Title:
  fglrx (not installed): fglrx kernel module failed to build [error:
  implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

Status in “fglrx-installer” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in “fglrx-installer-updates” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  trying to install ATI drivers

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
  Package: fglrx (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-4.4-generic 3.5.0-rc6
  Uname: Linux 3.5.0-4-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  .tmp.unity.support.test.1:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.3-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: None
  DKMSKernelVersion: 3.5.0-4-generic
  Date: Mon Jul 16 20:47:33 2012
  DistUpgraded: 2012-07-16 16:38:43,731 DEBUG enabling apt cron job
  DistroCodename: quantal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   bcmwl, 5.100.82.112+bdcom, 3.2.0-23-generic, x86_64: installed
   bcmwl, 5.100.82.112+bdcom, 3.5.0-4-generic, x86_64: installed
   fglrx, 8.980: added
  GraphicsCard:
   Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RS880M [Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series] 
[1002:9712] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
     Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:1641]
   Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Robson CE [AMD Radeon HD 6300 Series] 
[1002:68e4] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
     Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:1641]
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 
(20120425)
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC
  PackageVersion: (not installed)
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-4-generic 
root=UUID=051fedbd-e1fd-4b72-b1c0-4aa7cf7c4578 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: fglrx-installer
  Title: fglrx (not installed): fglrx kernel module failed to build
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-07-16 (0 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 03/24/2011
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: F.27
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 1641
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.board.version: 67.33
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.27:bd03/24/2011:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPPaviliondv7NotebookPC:pvr058A120000242B10000020100:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1641:rvr67.33:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrN/A:
  dmi.product.name: HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC
  dmi.product.version: 058A120000242B10000020100
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.8+bzr3249-0ubuntu2
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.37-0ubuntu2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.3-0ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.3-0ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.12.1.902-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.0-0ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 
1:6.14.99~really6.14.4-0ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.19.0-1ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.1-1build1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1025488/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to