hi. i am using ubuntu 12.04 on hp pavilion laptop with this optical
unit::   scsi 3:0:0:0: CD-ROM            Optiarc  DVD RW AD-7581A  BH05
PQ: 0 ANSI: 5    cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20         sr
3:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0.   brasero manages very well cds, but
doesn't burn correctly dvds (it is like it enters in an infinite cycle;
stopping it, it gives error messages, cannot closing disk or eject it)
and doesn't recognize double face dvds (recognized as single face).  I
installed  k3b and everything worked well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541019

Title:
  Brasero silently loses directories

Status in A disc burning application for gnome 2:
  New
Status in “brasero” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: brasero

  I can reproduce this with brasero on both Lucid and Karmic.  I add a
  directory tree to brasero, and when it finishes adding, there are
  files silently discarded.  The lost directory is:

    converted-to-tar/DRIVE-I\ \(WORK\)/NJB/DEVTECH/2BPORTED/YACL/

  which contains files and a subdirectory.  A weird thing is that I have
  a second, parallel, directory tree:

    recovered-drives/DRIVE-I\ \(WORK\)/NJB/DEVTECH/2BPORTED/YACL/

  which appears completely when I drag both to brasero.  The primary
  difference is that the latter directory contains everything, and the
  former (failing) tree contains the same tree structure, but only tar
  files converted from older archive formats found in the source tree.

  brasero on Karmic works a bit differently than on Lucid.  On Karmic,
  I'll be asked if I want to add the directory, because it is so far
  down in the tree, and that question will be repeated.  On Lucid, I am
  asked just one.  On Karmic, if I had *just* that one tree, it actually
  works, but if I add that tree along with its peers, it silently fails.
  On Lucid, it fails in all cases.

  FWIW, I prefer Karmic's handling, where it offered NEVER, NOT THIS
  ONE, JUST THIS ONE, and ALWAYS, rather than NO and ALWAYS.  I agree
  that if I want the option at all, I'm inclined to chose ALWAYS, but at
  least having the options was better than now.

  Even if I manually repair the project by dragging the missing
  directory into its place in brasero, brasero will silently drop the
  contents when burning!

  ALL FAILURES ARE SILENT.  The image contains over 33,000 files and
  over 1200 directories.  Were it not for the fact that I always store
  an md5sum.txt file in the root of the image, and always verify the
  burn with it, I would likely not have noticed the missing files until
  after the data might have been permanently lost.  I CONSIDER THIS
  CRUCIAL TO RESOLVE ASAP!  Silent data loss is unacceptable.

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Mar 18 11:02:31 2010
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 
'/var/log/installer/media-info'
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Package: brasero 2.29.91-0ubuntu2
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=C
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic
  SourcePackage: brasero
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/brasero/+bug/541019/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to