On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:47:23AM -0000, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > A while ago Osamu mentioned an idea to apply patches conditionally...
I have uploaded new version to Debian unstable. Please test it on ubuntu too. If I hear no issue over weekend, I will ask release exception. > As regards updating im-switch... Added an im-switch task as a reminder. > OTOH, I know that Aron and Osamu consider im-switch to be 'dead' and a > candidate for archive removal. In the light of that, is it really worth > it to spend time with SRUing that change? Yah, people are expected to upload to latest stable before migrating next. Why not. But maybe overkill... It only hits user if they changed conffile. If they did, this version may not be instal conffile overwriting user modified one anyway. That is why im-config putting return 0 into im-switch maybe better solution. (But that is violating ...) Osamu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to im-switch in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101836 Title: Needs to keep hands off when removed but not purged Status in “im-config” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “im-switch” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: In raring, we are replacing im-switch with im-config, but when im- switch isn't purged but only removed, scripts in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/ will still try to set related variables, so that im-config cannot work correctly. Fixing im-switch in Precise and Quantal is part of the solution to this problem, something else must be done for those who haven't got the chance to upgrade to the fixed version. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/im-config/+bug/1101836/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
