The bug still exists in ubuntu 13.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869635

Title:
  long delay at shutdown/reboot - network-manager doesn't close
  correctly

Status in “isc-dhcp” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “modemmanager” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “wpasupplicant” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “isc-dhcp” source package in Oneiric:
  Invalid
Status in “modemmanager” source package in Oneiric:
  Invalid
Status in “network-manager” source package in Oneiric:
  Invalid
Status in “wpasupplicant” source package in Oneiric:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  I've noticed the shutdown and reboot in oneiric is slower than in
  natty. This is reproducible on different machines with fresh
  installations.

  Disabling plymouth and vt.handoff=7 I can see that some processes are not 
closed:
  * Asking all remaining processes to terminate... [OK]
  * Killing all remaining processes... [fail]

  Killing network-manager at runlevel6, after the dbus shutdown signal,
  makes the shutdown and restart really faster (I'd say 5/10sec on low
  end machines like netbooks)


  --- /etc/init/network-manager.conf.orig 2010-05-03 14:56:09.745071317 +0200
  +++ /etc/init/network-manager.conf 2010-05-03 14:56:43.075152939 +0200
  @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
   start on (local-filesystems
            and started dbus)
   stop on stopping dbus
  +stop on runlevel [06]

   expect fork
   respawn


  after applying this I get no more errors:
  * Killing all remaining processes... [OK]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/869635/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to