Hello Maarten, or anyone else affected, Accepted pixman into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pixman/0.30.2-1ubuntu0.0.0.0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: pixman (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253041 Title: lts-saucy enablement in precise Status in “libdrm” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “pixman” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “libdrm” source package in Precise: Fix Committed Status in “mesa” source package in Precise: New Status in “pixman” source package in Precise: Fix Committed Status in “libdrm” source package in Quantal: New Status in “mesa” source package in Quantal: Invalid Status in “pixman” source package in Quantal: New Status in “libdrm” source package in Raring: New Status in “mesa” source package in Raring: Invalid Status in “pixman” source package in Raring: New Bug description: Bug #1242633 only deals with the packages related to pointer barriers. More packages need to be backported to enable building saucy xserver on precise: - Pixman, should be copied to precise, quantal and raring, to not deliberately break dist-upgrading too hard. - libdrm, to precise, quantal and raring too, for same reason. Bug #1171340 shows why renaming is unfeasible. Mesa in precise needs a small update to recognise -lts-saucy and lts- trusty renamed packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1253041/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
