[Expired for rhythmbox (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087017
Title:
WHY does rhythm box keep on mangling sort order of a library?
Status in “rhythmbox” package in Ubuntu:
Expired
Bug description:
I have RB 2.98 on my 32 bit Precise install (fresh install from CD).
After painstakingly correcting the ARTIST sort order for a decent
number of entries in the library, rhythmbox decides to throw that
corrected sort order OUT!
It will be "correct", until I quit rhythmbox. Once I re-open
rhythmbox, it goes back to what it was before. All of that time
WASTED.
For example, Alicia Keys should be sorted as 'Keys, Alicia', putting
her in with all of the other "K's"; but, for some tracks, rhythmbox
insists that the sort order MUST be Alicia Keys, not Keys, Alicia. So
what gives????
I do not believe that it is a case of permissions, as I have rw
permissions on all files.
They type of file (flac or mp3) does not affect this, as it occurs to
BOTH. BTW, I just checked one of the "corrected' entries. Where "Keys,
Alicia" was supposed to be, it was BLANK!
Does this have something to do with the ID3 tags????
Or, is it some consequence of rhythmbox "watching" my library for
changes??
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1087017/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
