Thanks! No, you don't need to test anything now...
I found why it is slow, but it is not something I could revert - I need to find 
proper solution.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566157

Title:
  Metacity's compositing is too slow

Status in metacity package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I did the following benchmarks between `metacity --no-composite`,
  `metacity --composite`, and `compiz`, in Ubuntu 16.04.

  First, I disabled vsync:
  $ cat ~/.drirc 
  <device screen="0" driver="dri2">
      <application name="Default">
              <option name="vblank_mode" value="0"/>
      </application>
  </device>

  Then I ran glxgears as follows:

  $ metacity --no-composite --replace & sleep 5 && glxgears & sleep 20 && 
killall glxgears
  29564 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5912.721 FPS
  29729 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5945.777 FPS

  $ metacity --composite --replace & sleep 5 && glxgears & sleep 20 && killall 
glxgears
  10366 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2073.057 FPS
  10194 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2038.702 FPS

  $ compiz --replace & sleep 5 && glxgears & sleep 20 && killall glxgears
  37633 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7522.813 FPS
  37990 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7597.965 FPS

  As a second set of benchmarks, I ran glxgears -fullscreen as follows:

  $ metacity --no-composite --replace & sleep 5 && glxgears -fullscreen & sleep 
20 && killall glxgears
  1652 frames in 5.0 seconds = 330.296 FPS
  1667 frames in 5.0 seconds = 333.281 FPS

  $ metacity --composite --replace & sleep 5 && glxgears -fullscreen & sleep 20 
&& killall glxgears
  886 frames in 5.0 seconds = 177.007 FPS
  891 frames in 5.0 seconds = 178.099 FPS

  $ compiz --replace & sleep 5 && glxgears -fullscreen & sleep 20 && killall 
glxgears
  1830 frames in 5.0 seconds = 365.868 FPS
  1847 frames in 5.0 seconds = 369.242 FPS

  
  Normalized results (with compiz=100):
  ================================
  Windowed:
  metacity --no-composite: 78 FPS
  metacity --composite: 27 FPS
  compiz: 100 FPS

  Full screen:
  metacity --no-composite: 90 FPS
  metacity --composite: 48 FPS
  compiz: 100 FPS

  So `metacity --composite` in this test was about 2 times slower than
  `metacity --no-composite` and about 3 times slower than `compiz`.

  This test was done an "Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4440 CPU @ 3.10GHz" CPU, with the 
following embedded graphics card:
  $ lspci -nn -k | grep -A 2 VGA
  00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 
v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0412] (rev 06)
        Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core 
Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [1458:d000]
        Kernel driver in use: i915

  I'll upload more tests if I find anything newsworthy.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1566157/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to