Public bug reported:
Why dont you split gvfs backends to multiple packages like fedora does?
•gvfs-afc
•gvfs-afp
•gvfs-archive
•gvfs-client
•gvfs-fuse
•gvfs-goa
•gvfs-gphoto2
•gvfs-mtp
•gvfs-smb
** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579504
Title:
SPLIT gvfs-backend like FEDORA/RED HAT does!
Status in gvfs package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Why dont you split gvfs backends to multiple packages like fedora
does?
•gvfs-afc
•gvfs-afp
•gvfs-archive
•gvfs-client
•gvfs-fuse
•gvfs-goa
•gvfs-gphoto2
•gvfs-mtp
•gvfs-smb
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1579504/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
