pitti | IIRC all *dm's postinsts need to set
/etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service to
| whatever was chosen in debconf
pitti | setting Alias= sounds correct, but not WantedBy=
pitti | we don't want *all* DMs to start
pitti | the whole mechanics for that is still horribly complicated and
redundant -- you can
| use update-rc.d, debconf, /etc/X11/default-display-manager etc.
pitti | I think /etc/X11/default-display-manager is still meant to be the
canonical way to
| configure this, that's why we skipped the [Install] sections so that
you don't
| introduce contradictions with systemctl enable/disable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1584575
Title:
/lib/systemd/system/lightdm.service file has no [Install] clause
Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
This concerns lightdm 1.18.1-0ubuntu1 in Xenial.
The /lib/systemd/system/lightdm.service file lacks an [Install]
clause. Meaning, that if you do
# systemctl disable display-manager
to prevent LightDM from starting, running
# systemctl enable lightdm
does not restore the /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service
symlink, and thus does not re-enable LightDM to run at the next boot
as intended.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1584575/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
