> To the SRU team: Bug 1642966 cannot be caused by the fix for this bug.
I agree. But nevertheless, users may still get errors when upgrading, and won't get errors if we don't release this SRU. So the failures would still be a consequence of releasing this SRU, so I think we should care. > Bug 1642966 is probably caused by some coincidence which had also broken any other update of the cups package. Agreed. I did some investigation, and I think it's a race. I added some details in that bug. So the question is: do we release this SRU in the knowledge that it will cause failures for some users (quite a large number given the numbers affected in bug 1642966), or do we defer until we can have a fix for that bug too? How important is it that this SRU lands sooner, rather than waiting and bundling a fix for bug 1642966 at the same time? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598300 Title: CUPS web interface stops responding after a while Status in cups package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in cups source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Bug description: after 6 minutes or so, cups is not responding. it do not produce error on the log, just stop working, worse, it exit with 0 ⌌—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————⌍ |root@cupsmachine :~# systemctl status cups | |● cups.service - CUPS Scheduler | | Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cups.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)| | Active: inactive (dead) since ven. 2016-07-01 10:31:32 TAHT; 2min 16s ago | | Docs: man:cupsd(8) | | Process: 28686 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/cupsd -l (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) | | Main PID: 28686 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) | | | |juil. 01 10:30:01 appli-client systemd[1]: Started CUPS Scheduler. | ⌎—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————⌏ I got to launch it again, so I have finish with a cron job like */10 * * * * systemctl status cups.service|grep -q 'inactive (dead)' && systemctl start cups but it is a dirty solution. I have no idea of what make it stop. NB: I have seen problems related to apparmor, this machine has no apparmor package. [Impact] If you want to use the CUPS web interface in Xenial and therefore set "WebInterface Yes" in /etc/cups/cupsd.conf, CUPS could auto-shutdown when it is idle and then an attempt to access http://localhost:631/ via a web browser fails. People get confused as other access to CUPS [Testcase] Take a CUPS setup on Xenial with no shared print queues and CUPS only listening on the domain socket. Activate the web interface via cupsctl WebInterface=Yes Now you are able to access the web interface via http://localhost:631/. Wait for some minutes without accessing CUPS until the CUPS daemon shuts down automatically. Try to open the web interface again and it will not work. With the fixed CUPS package CUPS will not auto-shutdown when the web interface is activated. [Regression Potential] Low, as we are removing a simple distro patch to get back to the original, upstream behavior. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1598300/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
