Marking incomplete / unassigning; the Security Team NAKed this MIR in a
different bug already, so if it's still needed and deemed appropriate
(including the previous comment about how it means we might ship
multiple browsers), then please set this back to New.

** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Incomplete

** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689317

Title:
  [MIR] epiphany-browser-runtime

Status in epiphany-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Availability
  ============
  Co-maintained with Debian GNOME. Built for all supported architectures.

  Changes from Debian:
  - Update to 3.24
  - 07_bookmarks.patch: Add Ubuntu default bookmarks (as seen in Firefox)
  - add_new_window_action.patch: Backported from 3.25, improves Unity 
integration a bit
  - ubuntu_titlebars.patch: headerbar revert when run in Unity 7

  Rationale
  =========
  Needed for Ubuntu to have a proper webapp feature, particularly for Amazon in 
the default install (LP: #1688627)
  The alternatives are to either
  1) ship Chromium, or
  2) water down the webapp feature to just be basically a bookmark which would 
have poor desktop integration and wouldn't really be a webapp at all,
  3) or drop the webapp feature from the default install

  Security
  ========
  The most recent fixed security bug is LP: #1661805 (fixed in 16.04 LTS and up)

  https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/epiphany-browser
  https://launchpad.net/epiphany-browser/+cve

  epiphany-browser is far smaller than either Firefox or Chromium since
  most of its browser functionality (and security vulnerability) is
  provided by webkit2gtk.

  epiphany does not support HSTS https://bugzilla.gnome.org/628298

  New in epiphany 3.24 is off-by-default support for integrated HTTPS
  Everywhere using libhttpseverywhere (not yet packaged in
  Debian/Ubuntu) https://git.gnome.org/browse/libhttpseverywhere

  Epiphany currently has no support for webextensions. NPAPI plugins are
  still supported.

  Quality assurance
  =================
  The Desktop Bugs and Desktop Packages teams are already subscribed.

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=epiphany-browser
  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=product%3A"epiphany";

  No autopkgtest.

  Tests aren't being run because of https://bugzilla.gnome.org/782246
  Once that's fixed, we'll be sure to make failed tests fail the build.

  Dependencies
  ============
  There are 2 binary universe dependencies, browser-plugin-evince (for 
integrated PDF viewing) and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37-gtk2 (for Flash support,  but 
see LP: #1689313). Both of those already have their sources in main and neither 
is required for basic webapps.

  Standards compliance
  ====================
  3.9.8

  Maintenance
  ===========
  - Actively developed upstream (the primary developer is paid to work on 
webkitgtk)
  https://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany-browser

  dh7-style short rules, compat level 10

  3.25.1 uses meson for building instead of autotools.

  Debian packaging uses svn, but we're hoping to convert to git this year 
(which will allow for Ubuntu branches):
  https://sources.debian.net/src/epiphany-browser/unstable/debian/

  Background information
  ======================
  The intent here is to split epiphany-browser into 2 packages. The existing 
package would only contain the .desktop and appstream metadata and depend on 
the other package (provisionally named epiphany-browser-runtime) which would 
contain /usr/bin/epiphany-browser and the rest of the app. This is what Fedora 
does so that they can continue to have only one browser in the default install 
(Firefox) but still support webapps.

  Therefore, only epiphany-browser-runtime and epiphany-browser-data
  would be in main; the other epiphany-browser package would remain in
  universe.

  I intend to upload this split version to Ubuntu but I want to see if I
  can get feedback from Debian about the proposed package name and split
  first.

  epiphany was in main until Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic" (no MIR).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/1689317/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to