Jörg, I pushed 1.0.27 from experimental to Ubuntu 17.10 because Ubuntu had been using an old git snapshot before which wasn't good at all.
Jörg, does it make sense to add 'Provides: libsane' to libsane1? PeterPall, please report this issue to the providers of those third- party plugins. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu: New Status in sane-backends package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: I don't know if that can be prevented in the long run. But both brscan (for my brother scanner) and iscan (for my epson scanners) have been broken by the change from libsane to libsane1. For iscan I have unpackaged the debian package, changed the dependency it contains from libsane to libsane1 and installed the changed package. But even then my epson scanners no more work leaving me without any scanner => Reporting a bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental1ubuntu2 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-041300rc2-lowlatency x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.6-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Jul 29 08:38:15 2017 EcryptfsInUse: Yes SourcePackage: sane-backends UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
