Launchpad has imported 33 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443689.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-04-22T21:05:25+00:00 William wrote: Description of problem: Every time I try to browse an SMB server I get a blank window instead of a list of shares. If I know the share beforehand I can type smb://SERVER/SHARE and it works. But as a user I'm stuck if I don't know the name of the share. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): This is a Fedora 9 Preview Live USB system with the following packages: nautilus-2.22.2-1.fc9.i386 gvfs-fuse-0.2.3-3.fc9.i386 gvfs-0.2.3-3.fc9.i386 gtk2-2.12.9-5.fc9.i386 samba-common-3.2.0-1.pre2.8.fc9.i386 samba-winbind-3.2.0-1.pre2.8.fc9.i386 How reproducible: Try browsing an SMB server without specifying a share like this: "smb://server". You will get a blank window instead of a list of shares. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-05-14T09:58:01+00:00 Bug wrote: Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-05-14T12:53:56+00:00 Tomáš wrote: Could you please confirm that firewall is disabled on your system or at least allows incoming Samba traffic? The SMB protocol is based on sending broadcasts to get list of available machines in the network and also to connect to them if not reachable via usual resolver ways (hosts, dns). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-05-15T13:59:20+00:00 William wrote: I disabled ip6tables, iptables and changed SELinux to permissive mode but nothing. It still shows a blank page with "0 elements" in the status bar. Going directly to a share still works but I can't get a list of shares. I don't think this is a firewall thing since Fedora 8 LiveUSB worked fine and I didn't disabled the firewall back then. Cheers. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-08-06T13:18:57+00:00 William wrote: Changing to rawhide since this is happening with a Fedora 10 Alpha LiveCD too. In fact it is getting worse. I can't even mount the share even if I specify the right URL: "smb://server/share". This at least used to work with Fedora 9 but not anymore. It seems the firewall is disabled and I changed SELinux to permissive mode but yet it didn't work. Because of this problem I'm stuck with Fedora 8 at work, I can't upgrade to Fedora 9 and it seems I won't be able to upgrade to Fedora 10. I hope this can be fixed soon. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-09-17T01:23:06+00:00 Matthias wrote: Can you try again with gvfs 0.99.8 ? It has a number of smb-related fixes. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-09-20T18:03:12+00:00 William wrote: Hi, Unfortunately I don't have a Rawhide machine at work but I'll sure test the next beta version using a LiveCD as soon as it's released. Thanks. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-09-23T13:49:09+00:00 William wrote: I decided to upgrade my personal laptop to Rawhide and bring it to my office. Unfortunately this bug doesn't seem to be fixed. The only thing that got fixed was http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547597 because using Fedora 10 Alpha Live CD it got worse, it wouldn't even browse the known shares. So, Rawhide is back to where Fedora 9 was: I can browse known shares if I know the name beforehand but I CAN'T get a list of available shares on a server. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-10-27T17:38:22+00:00 Will wrote: I can reproduce this on my home network. Firewall is definitely off, and avahi-discover lists the windows shares, so at least *some* form of server announcement is getting through. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-10-28T15:21:08+00:00 Matthias wrote: Taking this off the blocker list. As comment 7 states things work about as well as they did in F9, so we didn't regress. We have another patch in the queue to improve the SMB situation, but it is too invasive to land at this point. It will go into testing after GA. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-13T18:38:33+00:00 Charles wrote: 1. LiveCD doesn't have a firewall enabled. 2. The nf_conntrack_netbios_ns module should allow browsing to work even with the firewall enabled. Make sure /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config has IPTABLES_MODULES="nf_conntrack_netbios_ns" specified. But I agree that I've not had luck with browsing in Nautilus either. In my case, though, I had assumed it was because the samba servers on my local LAN were using hidden shares (share$). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-26T02:13:21+00:00 Bug wrote: This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-04T18:31:59+00:00 oliver wrote: (In reply to comment #11) > This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 > development cycle. > Changing version to '10'. > > More information and reason for this action is here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping i'm running f10 and i can't still see the shares unlike in 8 if i put smb://host/share/c$ then i'll get the prompt and browse the share but it'll mount the share Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-05T15:03:30+00:00 Fedora wrote: gvfs-1.0.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gvfs-1.0.3-2.fc10 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-05T15:34:23+00:00 Tomáš wrote: Please test the updated packages, read the notes posted in the link above and report any issues. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-05T16:16:50+00:00 Adam wrote: This doesn't resolve the problem of not seeing the contents of a share, for me. I can connect, as I have been able to for a while, but the Nautilus window still shows '0 items'. When I ran with the debug settings, it appears files and directories are being seen but they're still not visible. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-06T00:45:31+00:00 oliver wrote: updated to both gvfs-1.0.3-2.fc10 and nautilus-2.24.2-2.fc10 same experience just as to mention it again. when i click on the network icon i can see all the computers/servers in our domain if i click one windows computer i don't see the c$ and it does prompt me for username and password i don't see any and the count is 0 where as in the pass i'll see the c$ then just input my credentials and i'm it (that's the beauty i love about fedora) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-06T00:49:54+00:00 Charles wrote: Historically, share names that end in $ are supposed to be "hidden". Windows doesn't show hidden shares (at least it never used to, unless that has changed in recent versions). Maybe Nautilus is emulating this behavior for hidden shares? Can you try creating a share that doesn't end in $ and see if that shows up? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/42 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-07T04:25:31+00:00 Fedora wrote: gvfs-1.0.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gvfs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10848 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/43 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-07T06:32:19+00:00 oliver wrote: charles, you are correct, any shares with $ are meant to be hidden in windows but to my surprise when i started using f8 in our windows network i can see the c$ i just double click on it and a prompt will pop up and i'll input my credentials and i'll see the whole c$ i think it's the same on f9 but i'll verify that on monday at work on our domain i'll try creating a share not hidden thanks >ruxbo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-07T12:51:02+00:00 Adam wrote: To clarify, in my case the shares showing blank windows are on a NAS device running Samba 2.x. This update does not fix that problem. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/45 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-08T13:40:24+00:00 Tomáš wrote: (In reply to comment #20) > To clarify, in my case the shares showing blank windows are on a NAS device > running Samba 2.x. This update does not fix that problem. That's a different issue - bug 443047 and the proposed fix is outside gvfs. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/46 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-08T14:10:04+00:00 Tomáš wrote: (In reply to comment #16) > if i click one windows computer i don't see the c$ and it does prompt me for > username and password > i don't see any and the count is 0 > where as in the pass i'll see the c$ then just input my credentials and i'm it > (that's the beauty i love about fedora) I confirm that invisible $-postfix shares should be displayed however access to them might be restricted to super user group at the smb server side. Ruxbo, your comment is not completely clear to me - does it mean that you can correctly see the list of shares once you authenticate? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-08T18:49:56+00:00 oliver wrote: tomas, when i click on a machine on the network, it doesn't prompt me for username and password previously in f8 it'll promt me for the username and password then i'll see the c$ i just noticed in f9 it's the same as f10 when i click on the machine ont he network it doesn't prompt me for the username and password hope that helps thanks >oliver Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/48 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-09T20:41:24+00:00 Fedora wrote: gvfs-1.0.3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gvfs-1.0.3-3.fc10 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/49 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-11T08:03:12+00:00 Fedora wrote: gvfs-1.0.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gvfs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11176 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-11T16:11:53+00:00 oliver wrote: i've picked up the new update and happy to say that i can get to the c$ and admin$ shares click on network, it's populated with the machines in the domain click on a machine, prompt me for credentials hit enter and i see c$ and admin$ click on c$ and i'll be ask for credentials again then i'll see the whole c dir though in the past versions (f8) i only get to enter my credentials once click on a machine, prompts for credentials and i'll see c$ click on c$ and i'll see the whole dir hope that helps thanks >oliver Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/51 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-11T16:36:23+00:00 oliver wrote: by the way it still mounts the c$ which it shouldn't be and i can see the c$ under Places menu can that be fix? thanks >oliver Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/52 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-16T17:09:06+00:00 Tomáš wrote: The hidden (C$) shares are displayed by design and I suggest not to hide them as it might make users confused (think of enterprise customers). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/53 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-16T17:10:35+00:00 Fedora wrote: gvfs-1.0.3-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gvfs-1.0.3-4.fc10 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/54 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-16T22:06:59+00:00 oliver wrote: updated to gvfs-1.0.3-4.fc10 still the same i can get to the shares but it's mounting it, is that by design? in the past i can get to the share with out mounting them and still i can browse to it's contents thanks >oliver Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-17T10:06:21+00:00 Tomáš wrote: (In reply to comment #30) > updated to gvfs-1.0.3-4.fc10 > still the same > i can get to the shares but it's mounting it, is that by design? > > in the past i can get to the share with out mounting them and still i can > browse to it's contents > thanks Yes, that's by design. The philosophy of vfs mounts has changed since gnome-vfs and in order to access the data, you have to mount the share first. The same with "hidden" $ mounts - no decision has been made, we're trying to be consistent with previous versions and existing linux users. But don't expect completely same behaviour like in Windows. So, from your previous posts I understand the original issue of this bug has been fixed, I'm in favor of closing this bug. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/56 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-21T08:18:57+00:00 Fedora wrote: gvfs-1.0.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/193232/comments/57 ** Changed in: nautilus (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => High ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #547597 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547597 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232 Title: Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:/// Status in Nautilus: Expired Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Fix Released Bug description: I'm having the same problems as in this closed bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/26933 The thing is that I open Nautilus, browse my Samba Network and it's empty. I can connect directly to the server, but it does not get listed. Also, sometimes they show up, but when I click on a Samba service, for example, to IP 192.168.0.2, a message tells me that I have to open it with some program, because it's not a link!! (WTF). Then, it gets previewed as a text file. I'm using Ubuntu Gutsy, 32bit for clients; server is a SuSE 10.2, Samba. Windows Vista clients get it listed when I browse the network. We're trying to switch to Linux in the company I work for, but we're having trouble with Samba, so people's getting a bit angry. Sometimes servers get listed, then I try to connect to them, but it's impossible, because I'm not asked any password, nor user. It just gets empty again. I'm going to try to debug it someway (please, tell me how), and post some screenshots. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/193232/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
