I think you're asking for two things here:

(1) A thinner border (which I disagree with - it should stay thick and
highly visible like the window borders and panel underlines); and

(2) Adding rounded corners.

Can we make this bug about just #2?

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Low => Wishlist

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727421

Title:
  Desktop focus border radius not matching overview panel border radius

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  When enabling the activities overview, the current thickness/border-
  radius values of the currently focused desktop conflict with the outer
  perimeter of the overview panel.

  Solution:

  Decrease the focus border thickness and/or enable a border-radius
  value to the ubuntu.css override for the desktop/window focus border
  so that both corner roundings match and do not conflict visually.

  See attached image for details.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: gnome-shell 3.26.1-0ubuntu4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4
  Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Oct 25 12:11:03 2017
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-20 (5 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018)
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1727421/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to