Realistically, this is very unlikely to happen. Canonical isn't going to invest in chromium on ppc64el if the upstream project doesn't. Besides, applying patches at a given point in time is one thing, but maintaining those patches over time requires a significant and sustained amount of work. Who is going to do that?
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808170 Title: Build for Power (ppc64le) Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: It looks like the Chromium browser is not built for the Power architecture. To use Power servers as terminal servers or systems like Talos [1] as workstations, it’d be great, if you built Chromium for that architecture. [1]: https://raptorcs.com/TALOSII/ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1808170/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
