> we don't believe it's a release issue It would be good to elaborate when making such comments.
It's a drag on the archive in general when we have flaky tests, and even more so when they take many hours and potentially multiple retries to succeed. What's the criteria you're using here? Are we saying that "release" is only for user facing issues and bugs which have a negative impact on development of Ubuntu itself aren't to go through this process? If so, I think the team should come up with a way of being able to raise such issues. That would seem to rule out FTBFS for example too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785262 Title: arm64 autopkgtests are flaky Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: See http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libreoffice/cosmic/arm64. In the past 30 days, 8 out of 45 test runs failed. That a 18% failure rate. It would be good to understand if all those failures are similar, what's causing them, and if they can easily be made more robust. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1785262/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
