This bug was fixed in the package libfprint -
1:1.90.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~20.10.2
---------------
libfprint (1:1.90.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~20.10.2) groovy; urgency=medium
* debian/patches:
- image-device: Delay completion until deactivation (LP: #1897613)
- Support more synaptics devices PIDs (LP: #1905593)
- Ensure we properly handle references of prints galleries (LP: #1908107)
libfprint (1:1.90.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~20.10.1) groovy; urgency=medium
* debian/gbp.conf:
- Include debian's GNOME team preferred settings
- Prepare for groovy branching
* debian/patches (upstream cherry-picks):
- Properly handle aes3k devices, resubmitting commands.
This also needs proper commands cancellation (LP: #1897613)
- Add support for new Synaptics devices IDs (LP: #1905593)
- Fix vfs301 verification using device pointer on callbacks (LP: #1905597)
- Ensure we do not waste power for unsupported devices (LP: #1905603)
- Add identification support to synaptics driver.
It allows to unlock / log-in with any finger. (LP: #1905600)
-- Marco Trevisan (Treviño) <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Dec 2020
19:19:45 +0100
** Changed in: libfprint (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libfprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905593
Title:
Support synaptics devices 0xF9, 0xFC, 0xC2, 0xC9, 0xE7
Status in OEM Priority Project:
Fix Released
Status in libfprint package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in libfprint source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in libfprint source package in Groovy:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[Impact]
* We were advised by Synaptics to upgrade the existing libfprint in
the archive to include sensor support for 0xF9, 0xFC, 0xC2, 0xC9, 0xE7
as highlighted in the following commits:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libfprint/libfprint/-/commit/31319d9c6fe03f
[Test Case]
* We have several OEM platforms with these Synaptics sensors enabled
with Focal and they can be used to validate these changes.
[Regression Potential]
* Regression potential for an updated libfprint with these new PIDs
is low
[Other Info]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1905593/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
