** Summary changed:
- [SRU] Update to 20201225 (to support unicode 13.1)
+ [SRU] Update to 20201225 (to support missing emojis from unicode 13.1)
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] Update to 20201225 (to support missing emojis from unicode 13.1)
+ [SRU] Update to 20201225 (to support missing emojis from unicode 13.1) 🪱
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] Update to 20201225 (to support missing emojis from unicode 13.1) 🪱
+ [SRU 🪱] Update to 20201225 (to support missing emojis from unicode 13.1)
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Marco Trevisan (Treviño) (3v1n0) => (unassigned)
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
Many new emoji supported by various social platforms are not currently
visible in Ubuntu 20.04, because of old font (even though the shipped
ICU supports this version).
here's a list for Unicode 13 and Unicode 13.1:
- - https://emojipedia.org/emoji-13.0/
- - https://emojipedia.org/emoji-13.1/
+ - https://emojipedia.org/emoji-13.0/
+ - https://emojipedia.org/emoji-13.1/
[ Test case ]
This sentence should end asking "what do you want?" in the Italian way:
🤌
[ Regression potential ]
Emoji using a different composition not supported by 20.04 may show as
multiple icons instead than as a single emoji.
No emoji are shown when they used to be visible.
This is easily comparable using https://unicode.org/emoji/charts/full-
emoji-list.html where "Google" should match "Browser".
python3-nototools has no rdepends and the only one Build-Depend is
fonts-noto-color-emoji itself, so updating it has no effect either. Even
though in this case is not needed.
The design of some icons has been updated (compare browser with google
columns at https://i.imgur.com/HkA3kOz.jpg), overall the look is
- consistent though and given that these are not part of any core
- component it's not something that needs an UFe.
+ consistent though and given that these are not part of any documentation
+ or relevant component it's not something that needs an UFe.
--
Note: Building the package with focal version of nototools is fine
because fonts-noto-color-emoji depends on newer version only for tests
and metadata checks which is not needed by our builds.
This can be easily checked by diffing the resulting ttf extracting the
data with ttx, which is in fact matching (for what it concerns real
data).
PPA for testing: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
service/+archive/ubuntu/4534
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926047
Title:
[SRU 🪱] Update to 20201225 (to support missing emojis from unicode
13.1)
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Focal:
In Progress
Bug description:
[ Impact ]
Many new emoji supported by various social platforms are not currently
visible in Ubuntu 20.04, because of old font (even though the shipped
ICU supports this version).
here's a list for Unicode 13 and Unicode 13.1:
- https://emojipedia.org/emoji-13.0/
- https://emojipedia.org/emoji-13.1/
[ Test case ]
This sentence should end asking "what do you want?" in the Italian
way: 🤌
[ Regression potential ]
Emoji using a different composition not supported by 20.04 may show as
multiple icons instead than as a single emoji.
No emoji are shown when they used to be visible.
This is easily comparable using https://unicode.org/emoji/charts/full-
emoji-list.html where "Google" should match "Browser".
python3-nototools has no rdepends and the only one Build-Depend is
fonts-noto-color-emoji itself, so updating it has no effect either.
Even though in this case is not needed.
The design of some icons has been updated (compare browser with google
columns at https://i.imgur.com/HkA3kOz.jpg), overall the look is
consistent though and given that these are not part of any
documentation or relevant component it's not something that needs an
UFe.
--
Note: Building the package with focal version of nototools is fine
because fonts-noto-color-emoji depends on newer version only for tests
and metadata checks which is not needed by our builds.
This can be easily checked by diffing the resulting ttf extracting the
data with ttx, which is in fact matching (for what it concerns real
data).
PPA for testing: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
service/+archive/ubuntu/4534
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/1926047/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
