** Attachment added: "screenshot showing gparted versus baobab" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922551/+attachment/2696281/+files/gparted-verus-baobab.png
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #668827 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668827 ** Also affects: gnome-utils via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668827 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922551 Title: Baobab reports extension size bigger than it is Status in gnome-utils - GNOME Desktop Utilities: Unknown Status in “gnome-utils” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: My harddrive is approx 500GB. Baobab reports that it is 2TB. This happens if I run Baobab normally, or via gksu. GParted reports the correct size. Ubuntu 11.10 baobab: Installed: 3.2.1-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.2.1-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.2.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages Harddrive details included in screenshot (attached). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-utils/+bug/922551/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
