Given that this is an SRU bug there is no reason to subscribe the ubuntu-release team to the bug report. Is there some documentation that led you to believe that this was the correct thing to do? If so we should get that documentation fixed!
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017976 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.5.3 for lunar Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in libreoffice source package in Lunar: In Progress Status in libreoffice source package in Mantic: Fix Committed Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.5.3 is in its third bugfix release of the 7.5 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.5#7.5.3_release * Version 7.5.2 is currently released in lunar. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.5.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.5.3 (that's a total of 119 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.5.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.5.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_75/1277/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. Tested build can be found at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-prereleases/+sourcepub/14726196/+listing-archive-extra * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/lunar/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20230428_091914_c1745@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/lunar/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20230428_145808_db4a8@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/lunar/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20230428_112634_ff879@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/lunar/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20230428_092959_ffca8@/log.gz * [riscv64] not available * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/lunar/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20230428_214513_ee240@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 119 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2017976/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
