I have added a patch to GTK upstream to allow for file names to be more
easily applied via the api. However I always find its difficult to get
the Gnome devs to review patches.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382829

Title:
  Suggested output when printing a file to PDF is technical and generic
  "~/output.pdf"

Status in GTK+ GUI Toolkit:
  New
Status in GTK Version 2:
  Invalid
Status in GTK 3:
  New
Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts:
  In Progress
Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in “gtk+3.0” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  In Jaunty, GNOME print dialogs have a "Print to File" printer
  available in the Print dialog. When you select this printer, the
  output file's suggested name is "output.pdf" and the suggested
  location is the user's home directory.

  "output" is jargon, has the potential to collide with another file of
  the same name in the destination directory, and is difficult to
  remember as it has no relation to the name of the file being printed.
  Incorporating the source file's name in the output filename seems like
  a great improvement.

  Saving to the user's home directory is reasonable, but the Desktop is
  a more accessible location. We may also want to consider saving the
  PDF to the same directory as the source file.

  Suggestion:
   * Always default to PDF format.
   * Reuse the source filename if known, else use "Untitled" or the naming 
convention for unnamed files.
   * Default to saving on the Desktop rather than inside the user's home folder.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/382829/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to