I am going to wait for a decision about the CMIS feature re-enablement. Please have a look at the 7.5.9 SRU for lunar at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2044369 which will also re-enable CMIS support.
Regarding the Java related packaging fixes, it is unfortunate that they create some confusion. Upstream has changed its release schedule for 7.6.4 which got released today and I will update this SRU once more to track this new 7.6.x release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044019 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.3 for mantic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Mantic: Incomplete Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.6.3 is in its third bugfix release of the 7.6 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.3_release * Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.6.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.6.3 (that's a total of 116 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.6.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs 7.6.3 RC2 is identical to the 7.6.3 release * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_76/1459/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. Tested build can be found at https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15409029/+listing-archive-extra * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20231204_140350_e86f9@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20231204_121007_4cf76@/log.gz * [armhf] ... (autopkgtests infra problems on this arch) * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20231204_113322_18e7a@/log.gz * [riscv64] not available * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-ricotz-ppa/mantic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20231204_115147_339ff@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 116 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2044019/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
