Public bug reported:
The FTBFS[0] report shows an issue for gutenprint:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: architecture-is-64-bit but it is
not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
apt-get failed.
E: Package installation failed
The problem is that the package now no longer builds for armhf[1], which
is 32-bit. This appears to have been an intentional change by Debian:
gutenprint (5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* do not build this package on 32bit architectures anymore
Closes: #1064088
Closes: #1064089
There was no patch attached to #1064089, so I can not reproduce the
problems mentioned in #1064088. I am fed up with this poorly done
transition, so I won't spend more time with this. Sorry 32bit people.
-- Thorsten Alteholz <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:10:00
+0200
The transition referenced in the changelog is the time_t transition
performed late last cycle; presumably then reversing this change in
Ubuntu would merely exchange this FTBFS for a different one.
The question is then if the armhf binary for gutenprint was deleted from
the archive, would that result in other issues within the printing
stack?
0:
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20240912-oracular-oracular.html#ubuntu-server-pkgset
1:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-3/+build/28712797
** Affects: gutenprint (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: ftbfs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gutenprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081090
Title:
gutenprint FTBFS due to 64-bit restriction
Status in gutenprint package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
The FTBFS[0] report shows an issue for gutenprint:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: architecture-is-64-bit but it
is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
apt-get failed.
E: Package installation failed
The problem is that the package now no longer builds for armhf[1],
which is 32-bit. This appears to have been an intentional change by
Debian:
gutenprint (5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* do not build this package on 32bit architectures anymore
Closes: #1064088
Closes: #1064089
There was no patch attached to #1064089, so I can not reproduce the
problems mentioned in #1064088. I am fed up with this poorly done
transition, so I won't spend more time with this. Sorry 32bit people.
-- Thorsten Alteholz <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Apr 2024
23:10:00 +0200
The transition referenced in the changelog is the time_t transition
performed late last cycle; presumably then reversing this change in
Ubuntu would merely exchange this FTBFS for a different one.
The question is then if the armhf binary for gutenprint was deleted
from the archive, would that result in other issues within the
printing stack?
0:
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20240912-oracular-oracular.html#ubuntu-server-pkgset
1:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-3/+build/28712797
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/2081090/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
