Hello Benjamin, or anyone else affected, Accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video- vesa/1:2.6.0-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-vesa (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-vesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062159 Title: xserver-xorg-video-vesa 1:2.6.0-1build1 FTBFS on armhf Status in xserver-xorg-video-vesa package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in xserver-xorg-video-vesa source package in Noble: Fix Committed Status in xserver-xorg-video-vesa source package in Oracular: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] xserver-xorg-video-vesa 1:2.6.0-1build1 fails to build on armhf. Relevant log: ``` libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I.. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -I/usr/include/xorg -fvisibility=hidden -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/X11/dri -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fno-stack-clash-protection -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=/usr/src/xserver-xorg-video-vesa-1:2.6.0-1build1 -c ../../src/vesa.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/vesa.o ../../src/vesa.c: In function ‘VESALoadPalette’: ../../src/vesa.c:1437:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘outb’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1437 | outb(pVesa->ioBase + VGA_DAC_WRITE_ADDR, idx); | ^~~~ ../../src/vesa.c:1431:18: error: implicit declaration of function ‘inb’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1431 | (void)inb(pVesa->ioBase + VGA_IOBASE_COLOR + VGA_IN_STAT_1_OFFSET); \ | ^~~ ../../src/vesa.c:1438:12: note: in expansion of macro ‘VESADACDelay’ 1438 | VESADACDelay(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ``` [Test Plan] The package needs to build. [Where problems could occur] Declaring the function prototypes for un-exposed functions may cause memory safety issues should the API change. This was already a risk in an existing driver code that used a function without a declared prototype. [Other Info] n/a To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-vesa/+bug/2062159/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
