Gentlemen, I am tired of waiting for the bugs in Ubuntu 1010 to be corrected. I will not use Unity, I have therefore reverted to 10.04 LTS until I am able to find another operating system. I shall no longer recommend Ubuntu to anyone.
The failure to provide upgrades that simply upgrade the usability and functions or the operating system without requiring that the complete system be replaced is not acceptable. I used IBM's OS/2 WARP, versions 3 and 4 and the follow-on "eComStation" from Serenity Systems from early 1994 until IBM sold out on SOHO users, and Serenity Systems graduated to another supplier for OS/2 under a different name, but apparently only for business users. Apparently because we home users did not generate enough revenue from this extremely stable system. The continual upgrades to the operating system did not require replacement of the applications, as Ubuntu always does. There is a fix, which I should be happy to see, but doubt that it will be forthcoming. Separate the operating system from the applications. In this way it is possible to upgrade any without affecting the others. You might find that following my request will also improve the use in business as your continual upgrade problems is a (fill in the expletive) which would prevent me from using Ubuntu in a business. The problems are: The operating system and the applications can not be upgraded individually by the user. (If they can this is a well kept secret procedure from the ordinary users.) There are only three things needed. STABILITY in the continuation of usage of the operating system. Complete replacement of the operating system should be possible without requiring massive upgrades to the applications. Applications should never be arbitrarily changed by the OS supplier, but an alternate application may be offered. When this is done, the OS supplier must provide, if the alternate app supplier does not, a conversion utility to convert data for use on the alternate app. This may not make the data useless on the original app. RELIABILITY in the continued availability of the applications. SECURITY OF DESIGN. This means that security must be considered in the design of the system to as far as possible thwart malware. I suggest that the administrator's password must be required to add, modify, or remove any application. This requirement may be changed by the administrator for a period of 24 hurs. The OS will then restore it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830404 Title: Proposed removal of GNOME Classic desktop would be a serious usability and accessibility regression Status in “gnome-session” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: In https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/739812/comments/5 , Mark Shuttleworth said, "... we have the Classic desktop fallback in Natty, but will not in Oneiric." This is worrying. Any attempt to remove support for the Classic desktop is likely to cause serious problems for many Ubuntu users, either because Unity doesn't work on their hardware for some reason, or because they just don't like it -- and it's abundantly clear that many people don't like it. For the purpose of this bug, it doesn't really matter why people don't like Unity or why it breaks for them. (In my case, it's because I have a 4480x1440 total display area, for which many of the tablet-oriented design decisions in Unity make absolutely no sense.) It could be argued that that anyone who doesn't want Unity can stay with Maverick or Natty. However, since those aren't LTS releases, they are only supported until April 2012 and October 2012 respectively (including for security fixes). So that's not really an acceptable alternative to continuing to provide the Classic desktop until at least the next LTS release. In my case, I switched from Windows having no idea that Ubuntu would make such drastic changes to the interface in the very next release. (If I'd known that, I might have installed Lucid instead. But downgrading from Maverick to Lucid to get the LTS support doesn't make sense; that would just cause stuff to break.) It is possible to switch to KDE or some other alternative to Unity, of course (although making that switch from a GNOME/Metacity-based install is not without problems). Other environment/window manager combinations are usually selected using the same login screen menu that is used to select Classic vs Unity. Assuming that menu is still there in Oneiric (it will be, right?), and assuming that all the classic desktop packages are still available in the Oneiric apt repositories (they will be, right?), I wonder what simplification is really available from removing Classic as one of the environment/window manager options. If no simplification is available, then there is no justification for removing the option. So, we need some clarity: * what does "we will not [have the Classic desktop fallback] in Oneiric" mean precisely? Does it just mean not installing packages needed for the Classic desktop *by default* on new installs (but keeping them in the repositories and in a working state, and not messing about with them on existing installs), or does it mean more than that? * will anything that might be necessary for a particular setup currently using the Classic desktop to work, be uninstalled or disabled on an upgrade to Oneiric? (such as disabling the proprietary NVidia drivers as in bug 772019, for example) * if a user has explicitly changed the default environment back to Classic desktop in Natty, will installing Oneiric override that preference, and if so will changing it back again cause regressions like there were with the Maverick->Natty upgrade? (bug 734373 and bug 735861, for example) * for those users who do use Unity, will critical usability and accessibility regressions such as bug 654988, bug 739812, and (not specific to Unity) bug 762806, block the Oneiric release? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/830404/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
