Dan Kegel wrote: > On 6/21/07, Miller, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One of the recommendations from DAM4 was that since GDB is broken, it >> might >> be better to switch over to Eclipse, which contains a better debugger. > > That sounds confused. I was in the development tools meeting, > and I think the consensus was that Visual Studio-era > users want a good IDE, and the only open source IDE with serious > momentum is Eclipse, so we should start looking at making that work > well for LSB development. > I don't think we were talking about switching away > from gdb under the hood; as far as I know, the Eclipse CDT uses gdb, > and that's ok.
There is also ongoing work on provide GUI debuggers as Free Software, like Nemiver: http://home.gna.org/nemiver/ It uses gdb as a backend as well. It is not an IDE but one has to start somewhere, and I think it is a good supplement to Emacs ;-) Hub _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
