Hello Pat,
Pat Suwalski wrote:
>> If so, there is XEMBED Protocol Specification.
>> But, I heard that it is very limited.
>> Perhaps, we have to discuss about embedded UI specification.
>
> XEmbed is actually quite powerful, in that it's rather painless to put
> any XWindow into any container.
>
> Couple that with DBus, and it's possible to do some pretty power stuff,
> though it doesn't help with OLE-type embedding.
I imagine embedded UI as OLE-type embedding.
> Till now, there has only really been Bonobo for this sort of task. The
> Gnome developers have been trying to get rid of it for years, and the
> other developers never really had reason to use it. A DBus-based
> solution might solve that inter-desktop problem.
Common Desktop Infrastructure is based on DBus.
I felt that DBus was not fully object-oriented (or component-oriented).
So, we have implemented object-oriented layer based on DBus.
I think that embedded UI is needed in next step.
I think that our solution is close to your having said, don't you?
--
Daisuke Kameda
Japan KDE Users' Group: President
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kde.gr.jp/~daisuke/
immodule for Qt Project: Project Maintainer
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fimmodule_2dqt
SMG Co., Ltd.: Engineering Creator
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.smg.co.jp/
http://www.smg.co.jp/opensource/CommonDesktopInfrastructure/
_______________________________________________
Desktop_architects mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
