Thank you for your reply. But, I can't take the time explaining, because I am very busy with working and preparing for "OpenSource Conference Tokyo/Spring" held in Japan on Mar. 1st.
So, I'll send the mail in next week. Please wait. Regards, Kay Ramme wrote: > Kameda-san > > Daisuke Kameda wrote: >> >> I understood that we need to Make "bridge" for converting the existing >> protocol (e.g. Uno) to "super" protocol and for converting "super" >> protocol to existing protocol. >> >> If you mean "super" protocol as "the least common multiple" protocol, >> our vision is equal to it. But, it is difficult to implement by >> only our power. > > This seems to be another argument in favor of re-using something already > there ... > >> >> >> In the first place, in now opensource desktop community, is selecting >> one component technology possible? > > I don't see a reason why not. > >> >> If it is possible, has not it already realized? > As said, we in OOo have our own component model (as it seems most bigger > projects have :-), we likely could have implemented bridges to many > (most?) other component models, but that just had no priority, there was > no need for it from our point of view ... > >> >> Regards, > > Regards > > Kay > > > _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
