>On Monday 05 December 2005 22:32, Till Kamppeter wrote: >> --> >> Use of GhostScript for PostScript printers is not standard with >> linuxprinting.org. It is an exception, > >This is not my impression any more. It happens far more often than is >healthy for my inner balance ;-) > >I receive quite a few inquiries from customers who were happy that >linuxprinting.org/Foomatic seemed to ship PPDs for their PostScript >printers, and then turned to me asking "WTF? What is this foomatic-?*&# >doing to my printers?" > >I'll research a bit more and come back to this topic.
Is Ghostscript processing controlled by the --rerender-ps option? I notice that Redhat's printconf sets that when running in Asian locales (zh,ko,ja) Cheers, Waldo _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
