On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:29 +0200, Egbert Eich wrote: > > - Outlook replacement "better" than evolution: > > o Group calendar > > o Connection to Exchange > > o Repeatedly happening appointements (weekly meetings, ...) > > o Different SMTP mail send servers for each POP3/IMAP4 account > > This looks like a list of features that some user is used to > from outlook that are missing on the replacement he has been > migrated to. > The underlying question here is: > Do we need to reimplement all features of a M$ product to make > people who migrate happy?
Especially when all four things actually are implemented in evolution-exchange (well, depending on what they meant by "group" calendar). -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc.
_______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
