<quote who="Andrew Spott"> > 0) I put this on this list because here is where I read about the original > discussion of Gnome usability, I wasn't aware of a gnome-usability list. > Since I'm not sure where I would find this list, and I'm not entirely > convinced that this doesn't belong on this list, I'm leaving it here, if > more people complain, I'll kill it and restart it somewhere else.
This discussion has always been completely irrelevant on this list. Please take it elsewhere. > the gnome folks who turn down a feature because "thats too many options > for the user to deal with, we don't want to confuse the new users," This is not an accurate summary of the choices we make. We are always taking on new features, but we think extremely hard before taking on new "options". They are *not* the same thing, and do not have similar value for users (new or otherwise). - Jeff -- Open CeBIT 2007: Sydney, Australia http://www.opencebit.com.au/ "Beware the lollypop of mediocrity: Lick it once, and you'll suck forever." - Brian Wilson _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
